Wednesday, February 11, 2015

All Men and Women are Created Equal

In the 1800s women were not given the same rights as white men were given, they were thought of as "a kind of useless but beautiful object"(the Lavender article). Through hundreds of years of fighting for equal rights, American women have gained many rights to make them equal to men.
Women were not very highly valued during the 1800s and had to follow certain characteristics in order to be an ideal women. They were expected to have piety which was religious devotion; religion was able to be undertaken within the home, where women spent most of their days. Women were also expected to be pure, and purity was not only important to be an ideal women, but "A woman's only power was seen as coming through her careful use of sexual virtue."(Lavender article). This meant that a woman could control her husband if she used her sexual virtue as a reward to her husband for doing something she wanted. An ideal woman was also expected to be submissive, and therefore had very little freedom. To ensure that women remained submissive, it was required that they wore tight corsets which closed their lungs, and pinched their inner organs, corsets and other uncomfortable clothing that women were required to wear restricted their physical mobility, and made them weak. Lastly, a woman was expected to live domestically, or in the home and out of the public view, this was called the private sphere. Men lived more in the public sphere, which was a place of commerce and economy. The Cult of Domesticity limited a woman’s influence to the private sphere where she spent most of her time, and therefore women were not highly valued in this time.
Many women and some men wanted to change these unequal rights between men and women, so they held the Seneca Falls Convention. The conventions goal was to create more equality between men and women by creating a list of resolutions. These resolutions asked for things like equal pay, equal voting rights and equal treatment among men and women. From The Seneca Falls Convention the Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions was created. From reading the declaration, we can see that it is very similar to The Declaration of Independence in that the beginning two paragraphs have very similar language. In the Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions it was asked that women gained the right to vote. This idea of women’s suffrage was controversial because women were supposed to have their opinion voiced by their husband, but women did not have the final say, and if their husband did not have the same ideas as her, a women’s voice would not be heard in the vote. Also, a woman without a husband would have no opportunity to be heard, because she would have no husband to voice her opinion to.
The Seneca Falls Convention was mostly attended by white women and some white men, but many voices were not heard at the convention. African American women, Cherokee women, and the women of New Mexico had no voice in the discussions at the Seneca Falls Convention. I studied the New Mexican women, and found that they might have had some of the same requests, but also might have had a few different requests. New Mexican woman had been treated very badly by men, after the United States conquered their land. Ever since their land was conquered it was hard for them to earn money, half of them lived in poverty, but men were earning twice as much as the women. Before they were conquered the women of New Mexico were able to own their own land, but these rights were taken away after the United States conquered their land, and many of these people lost their land.  These women might have agreed with the resolutions about equal treatment among men and women, but might have added a resolution which granted women more rights to land to the Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions.
Of all the resolutions that we discussed as a class I think the most important resolution is equal pay among men and women. This resolution would give women more opportunity, value, and independence. This resolution could change the way society sees woman because it acknowledges that women can do things just as well as men can. I think our society has come a long way, and we have almost achieved the resolution of equal pay among men and women. But many companies would still choose a man over a woman to do a job, because they are still prejudice towards women.

In America people have definitely changed their views on women, and women seem to be equal to men in most societies. There are still some places where women are not valued, or given opportunities, but many societies have accepted women as strong people who can do things just as well as men can. 

Sunday, December 7, 2014

The Monroe Doctrine's Effect Today

            The Monroe Doctrine, issued in 1823, was an important part of American foreign policies for many years. Today this document continues to affect some of America’s decisions. Students and activists across America have recently held demonstrations and candle-lit vigils in response to the disappearance of 43 Mexican students. The US activists are opposed to Americas funding towards Mexican drug wars. They believe that the US is responsible for the corruption of Mexican security, violence, and disappearances of the 43 students. Ever since the US has given Mexico $2.1 billion to combat drug trafficking, murder rates have gone up, and police forces in Mexico have been corrupted. Many critics agree that the funding from the US is not beneficial to anyone.  

            If America was following the three lasting principles of the Monroe Doctrine they would probably have an easier resolution to their problem. The Monroe Doctrine talks about non-intervention, which prevents the US from getting involved with a foreign issue, unless it affects or threatens the US directly. With this in mind the United States would probably decide to stop their funding to Mexico. This would probably be the decision based on the Monroe Doctrine because although Mexico is close to America, the drug wars in Mexico do not directly affect the US. Until the drug wars do affect or threaten America, we should stop funding Mexican drug wars, according to the principles of the Monroe Doctrine. Today we can continue to refer to the principles of the Monroe doctrine in order to make hard decisions about foreign policy.

Citation: O'Reilly, Andrew. "Activists Gear up for Protests in Dozens of U.S. Cities for Missing Mexican Students." Latiniofoxnews.com. N.p., 03 Dec. 2014. Web. 07 Dec. 2014.

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Racism: Then and Now


                The Mexican Revolution happened because there were unequal rights between people of different races, and identities. A man named Miguel Hidalgo started a peasant uprising called the “Grito de Delores” to try to create equality among Mexicans.  Hidalgo was eventually captured, but Josѐ María Morelos continued to lead native and racially mixed revolutionaries against the Spanish and Royalists. The peasant uprisings led to a new government, which promised reforms to appease the Mexican revolutionaries, and Mexico became an independent constitutional monarchy. This revolution was started because of unequal rights between people of different races. Peninsulares in Mexico had more rights than the mestizos and Indians because their race was favored in the society. An uprising among the mestizos and Indians happened because they were not treated equal to peninsulares, just because they were a different race.
                Although our view on different races has greatly improved since the Mexican Revolution, racism still exists today. An article called “Alaskans need to pay attention to Ferguson, because racism is alive here” proves that racism still exists in America, even if it’s not easy to see. EJR David, the author of the article, presents a great point that racism exists even in Alaska, which is considered one of America’s least racist states. Many examples of racism are included in the article, one example stated “we see that four Native men can be convicted of murdering a white person with little or weak evidence, but four murder convictions cannot be done for the four white men who brutally murdered a Filipino man even though the entire murder was clearly caught on camera.” This proves that America is still affected by racism today, although it may be harder to see. Even our justice system has some racist ideas that effect Americans of different races. I agree with the ideas that were presented in the article, and I believe that although racism is not as severe as it used to be, there are still parts of our society that are racist and we must notice racism in our society today in order to stop it.

Citation: David, EJR. "Alaskans Need to Pay Attention to Ferguson, Because Racism Is Alive Here." Alaska Dispatch. 26 Nov. 2014. Web. 30 Nov. 2014.

Monday, October 27, 2014

Preventing Future Revolution with Holy Alliance

                 One of the most complicated questions that a ruler must ask themselves is “What should I do when my power is threatened?” Prince Metternich, of Austria, had to ask himself this question multiple times. In a group we were able to decide what Metternich would do in a certain situation, before we knew the actual results. We made our decisions based on the type of man Metternich was and what Europe was like during this time.
                Holy Alliance is the concept used by Metternich and the Congress of Vienna, which said that monarchs had a divine right to rule, and that revolution was treason against God. This concept was used to prevent future revolutions. Since Europeans respected God so much they lived under the monarchs because they believed God sent them to rule. Also many revolutions were prevented with Holy Alliance because in those times it was important to maintain a good relationship with God, and no one wanted to commit treason against God by starting a revolution. With holy alliance people of the Congress of Vienna eliminated threats to their power, since there were no revolutions.
                The concept of holy alliance was selfish; the rulers told lies in order to prevent their loss of power. But it was a smart decision to prevent further revolution, even though it wasn't successful and many revolutions resulted later on. I think a better decision could have been made if they gave the people what they wanted. If the members of the Congress of Vienna could sacrifice some of their power and create more of a democracy, I think it could make everyone happy and there would be no need to have a revolution.  

Citation: http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/1-congress-of-vienna-1815-granger.jpg

Thursday, October 16, 2014

One Man Influences All of Europe

                                                       


             Napoleon Bonaparte is a name that has been talked about all around the world for hundreds of years. We know of Napoleon today because he has left a lasting impact on the world. This one man is still discussed and studied today because of his bold accomplishments that benefitted Europe. During his time Napoleon had a lot of power, and controlled a large portion of Europe along with some land in the Americas and Africa. Overall Napoleon Bonaparte benefitted Europe in its economic, social and political systems, and a lot of his ideas influence Europe even today.


               Napoleon achieved many things in his lifetime that helped the economic system in Europe. He restored economic prosperity when he controlled prices, encouraged new industry, and helped to build new roads and canals. Napoleon also managed to establish the Bank of France which balanced the budget and undertook big public works programs. These changes made by Napoleon effected a lot of Europe and the changes were beneficial to the European economy.


               Not only did Napoleon change the economic system in Europe but he influenced the social system in Europe. Under his rule French armies eliminated serfdom, got rid of titles of nobility, ended privileges from the church, took away trade barriers, and stimulated the industry. Napoleon stole important artwork and great amounts of money from Italy during the French revolution, which may have sparked new inspiration for art in France. Napoleon also established the Institute of Egypt, which led to studies of ancient Egypt while he invaded Egypt. During his invasion of Egypt Napoleon also reorganized the government.  In a primary source from Madame de Stael, a woman who was exiled from the country under Napoleons rule, she describes Napoleons government "What particularly characterizes Bonaparte's government is his profound contempt for all the intellectual riches of human nature: virtue, dignity, religion, enthusiasm; in his eyes they are the eternal enemies of the continent.'"  She describes how she dislikes Napoleons system of government but his government actually showed Europe that intellectual riches aren't everything, this affected the whole social system in Europe, and we still remember this today, not only in Europe but all over the world. The Headley brothers observed that most of France accepted Napoleon and his ideas because he was  "as a friend of human liberty, and eager to promote the advancement of the race, by opening the field to talent and genius, however low their birth, he was infinitely superior to all sovereign's who endeavored to crush him." Many Europeans agreed with Napoleon because this idea gave skilled people an opportunity to be successful, instead of high class people. This shows why so many Europeans accepted Napoleons ideas and why he was so successful.


               Along with economic and social systems in Europe Napoleon also influenced the political systems of Europe. He was able to double the size of the nation when he sold the Louisiana territory to the United States and this led to the American expansion. Under Napoleon more citizens had access to education and rights to property than before. He also created a meritocracy which benefitted skilled people instead of those who had high social standing. A French soldier, under Napoleons command named Marshal Michel Ney describes his respect, and love for Napoleon and the changes he had made. The soldier says "The times are gone when the people were governed by suppressing their rights. Liberty triumphs in the end, and Napoleon our august emperor." This shows how Napoleons changes to the government were mostly beneficial to his people, apart from for a few exceptions.


            Napoleon was very successful across Europe and his ideas left a positive impact on the continent. He used his power for mostly good reasons that benefitted Europe in their political, economic, and social systems, and therefore left a positive impact.


Picture Citation:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-v2FGiGIpAIe5zjo7wbe6HEVqUSxk1Yd7-lLK-rfLYdkToo0CX58WyCz01hT0lVpK9La6Pi_JwjbhsB1WX5fVPqDDpl_2rHtUmiCdUesyR6fK372ozQ4K-InjHUPcq1Q2DHT4NHipC9I/s1600/659642-napoleon_bonaparte_1_large.jpg

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

A Fair System

               To show how capitalism and socialism work our history class used starbursts and they represented money. Some students were given more starbursts than others like some people are born with more money than others. Next the starbursts were redistributed equally among all of the students. This equal redistribution shows how socialism works, because the money (or candy) is collected and equally redistributed by the government (or the teacher). The rich students who had a lot of candy were frustrated with this method because their candy was getting taken away and given to others. But it may have been a god thing for the poor students with less candy because they were given candy that they didn't have to work for. I agree with Moran when she said that socialism gives the poor no initiative to work hard, because they know that they will get money (or candy) without even working for it. Students then demonstrated capitalism. They played Rock Paper Scissors to earn more starbursts, and like a student might win many starbursts from a game, someone can earn more money from working hard at a job in the real world. This method, capitalism, gives more opportunity for people to work hard and make their own life like Ryan said. Capitalism also gives people motivation to advance and work their way up to being wealthy, because their is no other way to earn money without working for it. In socialism it's more fun for people who are earning money without working (the poor) and might be frustrating for people who have to give away their money to pay for the poor (the rich). In capitalism it was fun for people who started with a lot of starbursts because they has less to lose, but people who started with less were more frustrated when they didn't have a lot of starbursts.
               Karl Marx began with the theory of capitalism, he believed that everyone started out with uneven amounts of wealth and had the choice to work to get more. People who were poor were not happy with this, which caused Marx to change his idea to socialism. In his idea of socialism the government had the power to collect money from everyone and redistribute it evenly so that no man was wealthier than another. Marx believed that socialism was more fair for the poor but the rich were not getting what they earned. Marx then decided that it would be better to have a classless society with no one who is rich and no one who is poor, this is known as communism. When the people decide to have a classless society no government is needed to control the redistribution of money because there is no difference in wealth. Adam Smith had an idea of the invisible hand. This theory of the invisible hand described that even without a government, the poor will be able to benefit. When there is more than one store or company selling the same product, there will be competition between the two, which will cause both companies to lower their prices and create a better product in order to get business. This is good for everyone, especially the poor because they are able to afford things, and the quality of the product will be better.
                 In my opinion I think both methods of government are a little extreme, so to create a balance of benefitting the rich and benefitting the poor I think the best solution is a mix between socialism and capitalism. The government we have today in America benefits the poor because the wealthier people pay higher taxes that can help the poor, but wealthier people don't have to sacrifice too much of the money they earned to pay for people who don't work to earn money.

Monday, October 6, 2014

The Choice to Protest

       
              During the industrial revolution there was a rebel group called the Luddites. Most Luddites were skilled artisans and they protested against unfair wages in factories, the deceitful manner in which technology was used, and the lack of appreciation of their skills. The group noticed that since the new machines had been created the appreciation of their skills had decreased because the machines made things more efficient and the efficiency of the machines caused their wages to drop dramatically. The following letter is an example of how an English girl working in the factory might have felt about the Luddites and their practices.

The following is a letter from a skilled weaver who works in the mills of England and is writing to her cousin, who lives in America.

Dear Sarah,
       The past year that I have spent working at the factory has been difficult. There are many corrupt practices in the factory, and recently a group known as the Luddites has decided to protest against some of the unfair practices. The Luddites protest against unfair wages, the deceitful manner in which technology is used, and the lack of appreciation of their skills. Last week I came into the factory to find that many of the frames had been destroyed by the Luddites. I've also heard that the Luddites dress up as women, and preform street theatre to make their protest known. I agree with the Luddites in that the new technology of this industrial revolution is decreasing the appreciation of skilled workers like me. My weaving skills were much more appreciated before industrialization and I'm sure that I would be able to earn more money with my weaving if it had not been for the new machines in factories. If I join the Luddites I can help them to stop the corruption in the factories. Please write to me soon, I hope you agree with my decision to support the luddites.
            Your Cousin,

Meghan


Citation: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-the-luddites-really-fought-against-264412/?no-ist=